10-16-2011, 07:28 PM
(10-13-2011, 07:34 PM)etojoy Wrote: I did some searching in the forum and found a thread recommending http://www.scrapebox.com/free-link-checker to check links, it was mentioned this was faster than the inbuilt link checker on scrapebox. ideas?
I use Free link checker standalone program when Im checking links and not the built in link checker. The only downside is that the free link checker doesn't have the option to save SERVER Error blogs. I usually give another test of the server error list as on the second run I find many of the links are actually working
In conclusion Free link checker is way faster and consumes less resources than the internal one. I recommend you.
Oh and another thing..if the list is really huge better SPLIT it in more lists .the link checker will handle smaller files better and faster. With big lists you may run out of the memory quite fast