03-27-2015, 04:29 PM
(03-26-2015, 10:54 PM)loopline Wrote: Yeah, I mean you can mail support and request an auto save feature, but the problem is that each engine gets an array of the keywords. So if you select the max of 4 engines in the detailed harvester it loads 4 copies of the keywords into memory, 1 for each engine.
So each engine can be at a different spot and saving 4 sets of keywords to disk in real time could get hairy at best and cause crashes of its own at worst.
The worst thing would be it would slow the harvester down, and probably take a rewrite of half the harvester to accomplish.
I know it would cripple the custom harvester with over 20 engines, but it might be possible with the detailed harvester.
You can mail support at
support (at} scrapebox [dot) com
But yes breaking up the keyword list would work as well.
In the main scrapebox folder there should be a bugreport.txt file.
If you attach it here I can possibly tell you what went wrong, or you can also mail to support at
scrapeboxhelp (at} gmail (dot] com
Good point. I only ever use Google. Are there reasons to use other engines? Basically just to get more varied results I suppose.
I looked at the bugreport, looks like I got a Out of system resources message in the middle of the night. That would probably benefit from smaller lists to tackle.