01-15-2016, 07:11 PM
yes I would assume if you mass submit them all that it could easily make google suspicious of getting flooded with links all at once. Better to have them found over time, unless you plan to keep your foot on the gas and not let of in massive constant link building. But its not exactly cut and dry either.
1.) no google can't see the ip, they would have to own the site to see the back end. Of course thats entirely possible they own a massive wealth of auto approve sites that they use as a giant honey pot network, but there is no proof of that its merely a possibility.
2.) I would mix the dos and nos for links because normal sites aren't going to have only dofollow links and its all about looking natural.
3.) PR hasn't updated since 2013, so you don't get PR any longer as google has said there may never be another update. You could get PR by other links passing their PR juice, the higher the PR of the page passing the juice the more PR you got, but its irrelevant now days from a sheer PR perspective as you can't know what the PR of a link that was built after december 2013 is nor of any of your own pages built after that.
4.) You will have to test this and decide for your self. Ive heard all sorts of numbers here but Ive seen links from pages with massive OBL help sites, so firstly I think it can vary some based on the end site, the site the link is on, the niche etc... But second google updates stuff daily and they have more algorithms running then I could even begin to count. They have algorithms for their algorithms and use algorithms to figure out how to better use their algorithms. Point being the reason people find loop holes and black hat seo in the first place is that not even google knows how every scenario will play out, although they are much better today then they were 5 years ago or yesterday for that matter.
1.) no google can't see the ip, they would have to own the site to see the back end. Of course thats entirely possible they own a massive wealth of auto approve sites that they use as a giant honey pot network, but there is no proof of that its merely a possibility.
2.) I would mix the dos and nos for links because normal sites aren't going to have only dofollow links and its all about looking natural.
3.) PR hasn't updated since 2013, so you don't get PR any longer as google has said there may never be another update. You could get PR by other links passing their PR juice, the higher the PR of the page passing the juice the more PR you got, but its irrelevant now days from a sheer PR perspective as you can't know what the PR of a link that was built after december 2013 is nor of any of your own pages built after that.
4.) You will have to test this and decide for your self. Ive heard all sorts of numbers here but Ive seen links from pages with massive OBL help sites, so firstly I think it can vary some based on the end site, the site the link is on, the niche etc... But second google updates stuff daily and they have more algorithms running then I could even begin to count. They have algorithms for their algorithms and use algorithms to figure out how to better use their algorithms. Point being the reason people find loop holes and black hat seo in the first place is that not even google knows how every scenario will play out, although they are much better today then they were 5 years ago or yesterday for that matter.