08-02-2019, 07:11 PM
(08-02-2019, 05:24 PM)bennyboy Wrote: Thanks, I will look further into it. Did you get any good results with this method please?
I mean, it's no longer 2009, so the results are decent but not explosive. I think this is a great method to use in addition to other strategies. I'm still learning (well, we're all always learning, right?), but it seemed like it produced a significant bump.
Not only have I been indexing my own sites, but when I use Scrapebox to make posts, I often go back and index many of the best sites from which I posted. It does no one any good to have backlinks from sites that aren't themselves indexed, I figured. Maybe this strategy is pointless, but it felt intuitive. Obviously there's not enough time to index every backlink to every indexing site, so I had to pick and choose.
I also used these two sites partly as the basis of creating my own list of indexing sites
http://www.indexkings.com/
http://www.pingfarm.com/
Once you enter some data in the two above urls, it's pretty easy to copy/paste all of their urls and replace the submitted URL with Scrapebox's {website}.
When creating your own mega indexer list, note the inconsistency between urls in free lists you find on the web. Some will show stuff like
http://{website}
http//{website}
http://http://{website}
https://{website}
https://http://{website}
and all kinds of other combinations. This is because previous people like us have simply copy-pasted lists together without trying to repair them. I've found it useful to do a search and replace for everything so it's always simple /{website} You can add your own "http://" or "https://" in front of your submitted urls if you like.
My list isn't perfect but I have to adhere to the Pareto Principle and say it's good enough. I spent hours putting it together and it's mostly good, but I could easily spend many more hours making it perfect haha...perfect isn't necessary for Scrapebox, I'm finding.
Good luck!